Tasks

 Home Tasks Research Peace-Building

A critical view of peace-building

The long-term goal of political and military involvement in the Balkans, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Afghanistan is to establish peace and security in the countries concerned. Whilst it has been possible to resolve the conflict and war in individual situations, the question remains unanswered as to just how sustainable those results are. There is doubt as to whether political/military involvement is a goal-orientated exercise at all, the reason for this scepticism being that there are fundamental ethical flaws:

  • Can external intervention achieve peace? Are the concepts themselves suitable? Are the political instruments and the military methods that are selected to accompany those instruments in themselves goal-orientated?
  • How, from an ethical perspective, do the intervening players justify their getting involved in the first place ?

Normal 0 21 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 This second question extends beyond the problems that we associate with legitimisation under international law based on a United Nations mandate: too often, the UN Security Council is exploited by players at state level who are intent on promoting their own interests and cashing in under the pretext of seeking to serve the common good. Is it the intention of those powers that become politically or militarily involved in the affairs of foreign states to secure political stability in those countries, or are they not, perhaps, simply out to promote their own interests? The spotlight is currently on international involvement in Afghanistan.

 

Responsible for this project: Dr. Heinz-Gerhard Justenhoven, Private Tutor and Director
Email: justenhoven@ithf.de
Telephone: +49 (0)40 / 67 08 59-18

Project processor: Sebastian Schilling, Dipl. Päd., M.P.S.
Email: schilling@ithf.de
Telephone: +49 (0)40 / 67 08 59-19

 

 

Intervention im Kongo  
„Intervention im Kongo. Eine kritische Analyse der Befriedungspolitik von UN und EU“, published by Heinz-Gerhard Justenhoven and Hans-Georg Ehrhart (Contributions to the Ethics of Peace 42)
(Intervention in the Congo. A Critical Analysis of UN and EU Policy on the Establishment of Peace)
The EU sent soldiers to the Democratic Republic of the Congo as part of a UN mission to ensure that the elections there were conducted democratically. If the claim holds that “no country may intervene if it does not have its own interests to protect” (Joschka Fischer), then the question to be asked is what interests were players involved in that intervention process actually pursuing. Was it all about peace for the Congolese people, democracy and a freely-elected Parliament and President? Or were the main objectives the national interests of the intervening states or the interests of the EU as a global political player? Are the parties in question in the Congo genuinely striving to build a stable political order based on the principle of political participation? What can future UN and EU military missions in Africa and elsewhere learn from the example of intervention in the Congo?
ISBN / Item-No: Cover: Pages: Published:
978-3-17-020781-3 bound 217 2008
Order now from Amazon